Should I Include Previous Employer Names in a Name-Blind Civil Service CV?
Employer Names and Anonymisation in Civil Service Applications
Hello,
I am completing a name-blind Civil Service application and the only CV section is called Employment History.
I understand that I should remove my name and personal contact details, but I am unsure whether I should also remove the names of my previous employers. Some online advice says to anonymise everything, while other examples include the organisation names.
If I leave the employers out, the history may be difficult to understand. If I include them, I am worried that the application could be rejected for breaking the name-blind rules.
What should I enter in the Employment History section, and when would it be safer to use a generic description of the employer instead?
Quick Answer
Name-blind recruitment normally focuses on removing information that directly identifies you, not automatically every organisation you have worked for. However, the live vacancy and form instructions control, so remove employer names if the campaign specifically tells you to do so.
Read our guide to applying for a Civil Service job for the relevant process, checks and practical guidance.
Need help with your own situation? Visit Get Tailored Advice or browse more questions in Advice.
How I Would Complete Employment History Without Breaking Name-Blind Rules
Unlock the Full Advice
Continue reading to see which instructions I would check, when I would keep employer names and how I would preserve useful context if the organisation needs to be anonymised.
Join our careers service to read more...
If everyone knew the best tricks and tips then they would no longer work! That is why the best guidance is for members only.
Subscribe to open the locked section on this page and get access to the full Civil Service Careers premium library.
Get help with applications, interviews, behaviours, personal statements, CVs, tests, workplace problems, promotions, and career decisions, all written for people who want a better result.
Already subscribed? Log in
